https://www.bmwcoop.com/2010/11/12/bmw-introduces-440hp-v6-engine-from-2012-for-the-future-m3/ Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:27:22 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.bmwcoop.com/2010/11/12/bmw-introduces-440hp-v6-engine-from-2012-for-the-future-m3/#comment-6945 Mon, 06 Jun 2011 15:27:22 +0000 http://www.bmwcoop.com/?p=7078#comment-6945 i can see this next m3 performing even better with more needed torque and less weight. this will catapult the m3 out of the turns like a rocket.

]]> https://www.bmwcoop.com/2010/11/12/bmw-introduces-440hp-v6-engine-from-2012-for-the-future-m3/#comment-6292 Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:31:04 +0000 http://www.bmwcoop.com/?p=7078#comment-6292 I can totally understand why Nissan has decided to go for the v6 route just look at their VQ engines massive power not to mention the GTR. The design of the gtr was horrible even after all the years ive seen the car i never thought it was nice, and wouldn’t pay 80k for it. Now going back to the v6 TT bmw will offer on the new m3. Whats wrong with the idea of the Inline straight 6 twin turbo? it offers smoothness, balance and most importantly POWER. Why is it that a company that has been making inline 6 engines for almost 100 years. Hasn’t thought about making a even more powerful Inline six engine with larger bore and stroke with turbo. that would attract alot more attention could you imagine 2012 BMW m3 Inline 6 Twin Turbo. Sounds alot more aggressive than v6 twin turbo. Not to mention Nissan and Toyota have protected the inline 6 in both supra and skyline. Why not make a different more grunting sounded inline 6.

]]> https://www.bmwcoop.com/2010/11/12/bmw-introduces-440hp-v6-engine-from-2012-for-the-future-m3/#comment-4720 Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:43:12 +0000 http://www.bmwcoop.com/?p=7078#comment-4720 I think I will put my order in now, before the waiting list
Becomes outragous.

]]>